These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred ahead of its promulgation. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is put in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents from the boy or Lady usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they might do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded on the allegations as such they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become achieved, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and proficiently.

S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation incorporates the names in the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it had been decided, along with the book in which it can be recorded. Different citation requirements may consist of italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.

In some jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, more info and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make sure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and also the case shall be decided via the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases read within the state court, for the same level.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well set up now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if happy that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.